Monday, June 02, 2008

The Touchstone and the Labyrinth: A Step into the Mystery of Money

Classic labyrinth at Lifebridge Foundation, Rosendale, NY


The Touchstone and the Labyrinth: A Step into the Mystery of Money

There are occasions when a mix of metaphors actually generates new meaning, though I was scolded often enough the practice by my English teachers. In my recollection, though, they never mentioned that there might be value and meaning in understanding and finding language for a real spiritual world and my place in it as part of conventional discourse, as challenging as that might be. Of course, forgiveness is in order since I was being taught at a time when science held objective knowledge of the material world as an article of faith. So, I learned to live with that myth along with the ongoing wonder and mystery of experience.

Now, from a pathway through the visual arts whose purpose artist Paul Klee said is “to make the invisible visible,” I have come to recognize money as a medium of expression, as a social technology, and one that also makes the invisible visible by bringing together value with material goods. Money taps as deeply into the human interior as it circulates widely about the world. While it is not a hard stretch to see that spirit and matter coalesce in nature, it is a more complicated proposition to see that spirit and matter coalesce in human nature. As a human invention and intervention money is an exemplar of and living laboratory for this play between interiority and exteriority—one aspect of spirit and matter. Money is linked to our material needs and our participation in economic life, and yet what it represents is entirely abstract, non-material and, to a degree, faith based. Value is thus a big player in the mystery drama of money.

A mystery is by definition enigmatic, and tracing back to the invisible from the visible is an exercise fraught with ambiguity. However, I hope that a step, taken with humility may shed some light on the experience of money’s mystery. This inquiry explores two ancient objects, the labyrinth and the touchstone. Both have come to serve as symbols of and metaphors for the physical and experiential aspect of money. The labyrinth hosts the personal pilgrimage, the journey one takes reflectively while moving through one’s life path. The touchstone is used to measure the quality or purity of gold (as well as silver and other alloys) by applying dilutions of acid—the acid test, literally. Both objects denote material meaning and purpose, and both have come through connotation to be used as metaphors for experience. In combination they speak to me of the mystery, the inside out of money.

Those who have walked a labyrinth with an open heart know the power of the experience. Its path is a ritual journey from the threshold at the entrance to a more metaphoric threshold at the center—a path of discovery and self knowledge. Walking the path, one feels part of some deep archetypal world filled with energetic and intuitional processes. As one comes to the center, there is no further one can travel on the horizontal plane of the earth. Instead, the journey turns vertical traveling from the gravitation stillness of the feet through the earth and up through the uprightness of the spine toward the sky. It is on the vertical axis that one turns to commence the outward journey.

It is a beautiful and powerful moment, that merging of vertical and horizontal. It is a private journey in which my inner and outer self meet each other, and through integration make meaning together. The center of the labyrinth is, in concentrated and magnified form, an imagination of many moments I experience each day as I move about the world aware of myself and myself in relation to others, in conversations and interactions as I and we. Such transactions (and I mean this in the highest sense) happen parallel to or across the plane of the earth. However, there is another element to a transaction that has more of a vertical quality. As one is in conversation with another, meaning arises (or descends, both vertical actions) out of mutual understanding. It is almost as if it transcends the two individuals present. This meaning is carried inwardly as it is transformed into understanding, and then outwardly as it moves to action. In a financial transaction, the third element, the meaning so to speak, to the transaction is value. Again, it arises (or descends) at the moment of the transactional agreement, then disappears until such time as the object being traded is the subject of another transaction. Thus, like language, money is both a medium of exchange (horizontal) and a measure of value (vertical)—a kind of mathematical metric of meaning.

The labyrinth is an ancient form or figure found nearly everywhere in the world, across many cultures, and in many variations of design, scale, and formulation. The form is emblematic in and of itself, and serves as a framework for ritual; it is both container and contained, design and process. Labyrinths are remarkably simple in a certain way, as are many archetypal forms. There was a practical necessity for the simplicity. They were carved into stone as soft as sandstone and as hard as granite. These ancient petroglyphs look sometimes like a cosmic fingerprint, sometimes like a map of the human brain. Where they were constructed to be walked, they emanate an invitation to the journey.

Stone is a currency of labyrinths. Most are built with stone or stone tiles, thus each stone contributes to the energetic pathos of the form. The path of the labyrinth is one of consciousness, a spiritual journey bounded by the materiality of the mineral world. It is a fascinating relationship between the spiritual and the material; each requires the other to have whole meaning. And, it is through the physical and metaphysical uprightness of the human being that both are recognized and realized as a confluence of nature and human nature.

As much as the mineral kingdom has provided the stones of our architecture, walls and ways, it has also provided a vein of metals and crystalline stones that were deemed precious for their properties; their perceived value has played out in complicated scenarios throughout history. Gold, of course, comes to mind. It has been mined from ancient times and has always had great value attached to it, for its beauty, durability, stability, malleability, and rarity. The now long ago stolen capstones of the Egyptian pyramids were made of gold—gold placed at the intersection of earth and heaven, of the material and spiritual. Gold serves as emblematic representative of the power of the pharaoh, ruler over all things material and the only earthly embodiment of the spiritual world and the afterlife.

At the same time, gold was used as the material of some of the earliest money in the Dead Sea and Mesopotamian regions for the sacred power it retained, even as materialism was rising. And, of course, a measure for the quality and purity of gold was needed as forms of metallic coinage came increasingly into use as a storage device for value in trade and exchange.

The storied touchstone, a stone of fine grained schist or jasper, has a long history of use by the assayers of the value and purity of gold. It was used as early as the fifth century BCE, and continues to be used to this day for the same purpose. The method is straightforward. The gold to be tested is swiped across the stone, next to one from gold of known purity. After an initial comparison, the test strip is lightly washed over with dilute acid which dissolves impurity and alloy metals, but not the gold. Through a progression of increasingly concentrated acid, the quality of the gold is determined. This is the science of the touchstone. Its poetry is as a litmus test or standard bearer of quality or tone, a metaphoric benchmark of value.

Both the touchstone and the labyrinth have a sense of ritual about them, ritual processes leading to revelation of outer value and inner worth, an alignment of the outer and inner. So they serve well in harmony to characterize some of the archetypal aspects of the money mystery.

But money has changed in recent years. It has become much less connected to the human experience as exemplified by the touchstone and the labyrinth. Just as we may be coming to a place of understanding something of its mystery by exploring the world of stones, its physical and metaphysical aspects, money has essentially jettisoned all physicality. It has been reduced to electronic pulse, a pure currency that moves invisibly and speedily. Our bank accounts are mere way stations, and our on-line accounts and ATM machines nothing more than meters for the comings and goings, credit and debits. There is no relevant test for the purity of the medium of exchange, and no time to journey with it through transactions. The touchstone and the labyrinth are about real experiential value, much as money has been throughout its history.

Recent currency has no real value, no reference point as found with the touchstone. We live, instead, with fiat currency which means that it has no standard or reference tied to the mineral world or otherwise. The United States officially left the gold standard in 1972 under President Nixon. Today’s money is simply made legal by governmental decree, meaning that it is actually a fiction declared as fact. So I am left with the question: Post the experiential and metaphoric relevance of the touchstone and the labyrinth, post a material basis for money itself, how to we go about understanding money in relation the human psyche? Where, or even how, does money reside in the mystery of the human being? What tools and senses are needed when the work at hand is no longer about making the invisible visible? Instead what seems at work in the impenetrability of Wall Street transactions such as sub-prime loans and other “exotic” financial instruments, is keeping the invisible invisible. The process for this is to use the language of visibility and count on the habit of continued belief in its truth, because it may be too painful and disruptive to do otherwise. Hans Christian Andersen’s fairytale “The Emperor’s New Clothes” comes to mind, a story in which all the wisest counselors and courtiers convince the king that the new robes being made for him are the most magnificent, even though they do not appear at all. Of course, in Andersen’s story, it takes the innocence of the child’s voice to call out the truth in public and to lift the veil of illusion from the emperor’s eyes.

Though there seems no need for the touchstone to measure the quality of the coin, to test our mettle so to speak, the essence of the labyrinthine journey may be more important than ever. As money is increasingly reduced to nano units and moves ever faster, it will become increasingly indistinguishable from the rest of our experience in the world. For example, there will be less time to exercise the kinds of choices that are now the privilege of the conscious consumer. The moment of purchase could be almost simultaneous with the thought of the purchase. Thus, the spiritual self we come to know through the journey with all its gifts and foibles, desires and needs, will be, completely visible in the economic self that buys, sells, invests, and gives. We may already be there; but we are still able to operate under the cloak of rationalized invisibility. Where is that innocent child’s voice? And, when will we hear it?

John Bloom
©2008

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home